Contact Us

ISO 15118 vs OCPP: Two Conversations, One Charger

Table of Content [Hide]

    Every DC fast charger on a commercial site is holding two conversations at the same time. They run in parallel, they use different protocols, and they answer to different masters. Confusing them is the single most expensive misunderstanding in EV charging procurement. 


    ISO 15118 vs OCPP Two Conversations One Charger 1


    Conversation one: the car and the charger

    This is ISO 15118 — the international standard for digital communication between an electric vehicle and a charging station. It covers a narrow but critical scope:


    Vehicle identity and authentication (who is this car, and whose account pays) 


    Charging parameter negotiation (how much power, what voltage window, what schedule)


    Real-time power exchange and status during the session 

    Bidirectional energy transfer, known as V2GWhen a driver plugs in and the session starts without a card, an app, or a single tap, ISO 15118 is what happened. That is Plug & Charge. 

    When a driver plugs in and the session starts without a card, an app, or a single tap, ISO 15118 is what happened. That is Plug & Charge. 


    Conversation two: the charger and the cloud

    This is OCPP — the Open Charge Point Protocol, maintained by the Open Charge Alliance. It has nothing to do with the vehicle. Its entire job is connecting the station to the backend management system (CSMS):


    Why "we support OCPP" is not an answer

    A charger can be fully OCPP-compliant and still be unable to talk to a modern vehicle beyond basic PWM signaling. It will charge, and it will bill — but it cannot do Plug & Charge, cannot negotiate a charging schedule, and cannot participate in any V2G program.The reverse is equally common: a charger with a solid ISO 15118 stack but a bare-bones OCPP implementation becomes a site the operator has to visit in person. Every restart, every firmware fix, every tariff change turns into a drive. 

    The reverse is equally common: a charger with a solid ISO 15118 stack but a bare-bones OCPP implementation becomes a site the operator has to visit in person. Every restart, every firmware fix, every tariff change turns into a drive.

     

    The two questions that separate suppliers

    When you evaluate a charger supplier, do not ask whether they "support smart charging." Ask two specific questions instead: 

    1. "Which ISO 15118 implementation is in the vehicle interface — -2, -20, or both? And is DIN 70121 supported as a fallback?"

    The fallback matters more than buyers expect. A large share of vehicles on the road today still rely on DIN 70121. A charger that speaks only ISO 15118-20 will fail on them, and the failure looks like a charger fault, not a protocol gap. 

    2. "Which OCPP version does the station speak, and over which transport?"

    "OCPP 1.6J" alone is incomplete. The answer you want is "1.6J over secure WebSocket," plus a defined path to 2.0.1 — because 2.0.1 is where certificate management, ISO 15118 integration and richer device modeling live.A supplier that answers both precisely is a supplier that owns its communication stack. One that answers vaguely is usually integrating third-party modules it cannot debug. 

    A supplier that answers both precisely is a supplier that owns its communication stack. One that answers vaguely is usually integrating third-party modules it cannot debug. 


    What we build

    At AUPINS , both conversations are developed in-house. Our ISO 15118 protocol boards (EVCC and SECC) run -2 and -20 with DIN 70121 compatibility, and our DC fast chargers ship with OCPP 1.6J over WSS and a committed 2.0.1 upgrade path.If you are specifying a charger — or building one — start by making sure both conversations are on the table. 

    If you are specifying a charger — or building one — start by making sure both conversations are on the table. 





    ISO 15118 vs OCPP: Two Conversations, One Charger
    Nov 09, 2026
    ISO 15118 vs OCPP: Two Conversations, One Charger
    Every DC fast charger on a commercial site is holding two conversations at the same time. They run in parallel, they use different protocols, and they answer to different masters. Confusing them is th...
    16A vs 32A Type 2 Charging Cables: A Single-Phase and Three-Phase Stocking Guide
    Nov 04, 2026
    16A vs 32A Type 2 Charging Cables: A Single-Phase and Three-Phase Stocking Guide
    For EV charger distributors, installers and charging equipment resellers, stocking the right cable specifications helps meet different customer requirements without tying up inventory in unsuitable pr...
    7, 11 or 22 kW AC Wallbox Chargers: How to Specify a Commercial Parking Project
    Nov 01, 2026
    7, 11 or 22 kW AC Wallbox Chargers: How to Specify a Commercial Parking Project
    Commercial EV charging projects require more than selecting the highest available power rating. Parking duration, vehicle compatibility, electrical capacity and installation costs all influence the ri...
    +86-18512525557
    felixxu@aupins.com
    1111, 11th Floor, Shanchuang Cultural Business Building, Yuhuatai District, Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province, China
    Contact Us
    felixxu@aupins.com
    1111, 11th Floor, Shanchuang Cultural Business Building, Yuhuatai District, Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province, China
    We use cookies on this site, including third party cookies, to delivery experiennce for you.
    Accept Cookies
    Read Privacy Policy
    ×